WSJ was for payday lending before it was against it

If payday lending proves a point against Obama, they’re for it. If anti-payday lending proves a point against Obama, they’re for it. It’s called consistency – they’re against Obama!

Enjoy it while you can, because unless you’re a high roller you will soon be paying for check-writing privileges. The price controls have also caused banks to deny credit to marginal borrowers—i.e., those with low incomes. Many have been forced out of the formal banking system and into the arms of payday lenders

Gasp. Evil payday lenders. That should never happen. Who’s fault was this really? Was it regulations?

Payday lenders like Advance America are pushing hard to lure away customers from traditional banks. The effort is getting a boost from the industry’s loan crunch, especially for borrowers with blemished credit, and toughened regulation of fees and interest rates charged by the nation’s 7,760 banks and savings institutions

Oh, it was banks fault? Cue Gilda Radner. Neeevvvverrr mind.

Let it not be said that no one cares about the plight of poor people like the WSJ. Really. Don’t say it.

 

 

Advertisement

Leave a Comment

Filed under Assholes, Crony capitalism, Crooked bankers, Crooks, Pay

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s